Quantcast
 
 
 
AFGHANISTAN

Border Wars

A rising number of cross-frontier incursions are raising tensions—and security challenges—on the volatile Afghanistan-Pakistan frontier, says NATO's new commander in the region.

Shah Marai / AFP-Getty Images
Schloesser: 'We are achieving a great deal of success in security, governance and development'
 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

As the new commander of NATO's 22,000 predominantly American combat troops operating along the rugged and mountainous frontier Afghanistan shares with Pakistan, U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Jeffrey J. Schloesser could hardly have a tougher assignment. His men are responsible for guarding the long, porous border from insurgent attacks and infiltration emanating from Pakistan's largely ungoverned tribal area, where Al Qaeda-linked Afghan Taliban, allied Pakistani tribal militants and other Pakistani extremists enjoy safe havens. Ever since the Pakistani military began peace talks with tribal leaders some three months ago, these militants have increased their cross-border attacks and infiltration. Not only are Schloesser's men charged with preventing these incursions, they are also involved in working with Afghanistan's fledgling security forces, its local government appointees and tribal elders to provide security and a degree of economic development for the region's poor villagers. A 32-year Army veteran who has been in command of NATO's Regional Command-East (RC-East) since early April, Schloesser has served in Germany, South Korea, Haiti, Kosovo and Iraq. Concurrently commander of the US Army's elite 101st Airborne Division, from his Bagram headquarters he talked in a telephone interview with NEWSWEEK's Ron Moreau about the challenges he faces. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: How concerned are you about the ongoing peace negotiations in Pakistan's tribal area, talks that don't seem to include any prohibitions on insurgent cross-border attacks and movement into Afghanistan?
Gen. Jeffrey Schloesser:
Pakistan is a sovereign country. Our interest from NATO's perspective is that whatever agreements are made will hopefully be enforceable. I would expect that there would be some attempt [by the Pakistani military] to ensure that security is provided in those areas in Waziristan or other [tribal] agencies further north. Obviously, from my perspective I'm interested in security and stability along the border.

What about reports that the insurgents' cross-border attacks and infiltration into Afghanistan have increased over the past two or three months, as the peace deal was being negotiated?
I've been in command about 45 days, so even I have to put a pinch of salt on anything I say. But I am deeply concerned that there appear to be a fair number of cross-border incidents that both bring tension to the border and also obviously require border operations on the part of coalition forces here in Afghanistan. That drives us [away] from what I am trying to do, which is give security to the people of Afghanistan and help the Afghan people develop and strengthen local governance.

What about reports of an uptick in Pakistanis, both from the tribal area and from Pakistan's Punjab and other provinces, coming across the border along with Afghan Taliban from Pakistani safe havens to fight with Taliban forces?
The insurgents we see coming across the border, and those that we are dealing with inside Afghanistan, are a diverse lot. It's a variety, not just one group. It's not just the conservative, Kandahar [province]-based Taliban. You can say they share a common ideology, but sometimes even that is unclear. There seems to be a strong degree of cooperation [among them]. Some help with financing, some with facilitation to help them get across and also move weapons across the border. Others help train and recruit fighters not only within Pakistan but elsewhere as well. I wouldn't say that I have seen a lot of what I would call Pakistanis. I would not want to call this a large or organized movement. These are largely smaller insurgent groups and terrorists from different regions participating in this. One thing I would not want to do is to send a message that I believe that Punjabis are crossing the border. I don't believe that we see that.

Some experts have warned that Afghan and coalition forces are not winning in Afghanistan. How would you describe your biggest challenge to try to turn things around?
In RC-East [which comprises 14 eastern provinces] we are seeing success each and every day. We are working very closely with the Afghan national security forces. And we are achieving a great deal of success in security, governance and development. But my daily concern is the [unstable] border region that seems to add tension between the Afghans and the Pakistanis and coalition forces. We are all really fighting the same enemy. I have to spend a lot of time addressing those issues along the border.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: Baldy @ 05/25/2008 4:21:35 PM

    Comment: I saw the title "Border Wars" and hoped it would be the Mexican/American Border War has escalated to include the Marines, but no way. Uh-uh. Not in America.

    Fools.

  • Posted By: R Lawrence @ 05/24/2008 8:26:58 PM

    Comment: What a mess! But, war has always been a mixture of uncontrolled and undefined people vs those with a possible vision of what the situation really is and how to achieve desired goals. However, there is always the spoiler in the environment and in this war it was the neo-cons in Washington, who until the present, have not admitted that they make a huge mistake by leaving Afganistan weak and diverting the military to fight in Iraq. Now we find ourselves in a situation where both wars are draining our capasity to fight effectively and conditions where outside interests are working only on their own personal agendas. In Iraq, Iran is the real winner and in Afganistan, the world's worst terrorist groups are reaping the dividends from a weakened effort by the US and the Allies. Iraq will be, for many years to come, America's economic and military drain. Bush and company should be held responsible, not only by Americans but by the entire world, accountable for their incompitance and complete leadership failures.

  • Posted By: sb0614 @ 05/24/2008 1:25:23 PM

    Comment: Pakistani ISI is a two headed monster. First, it wanted a Pakistan friendly Afghanistan,consequently, it nurtured the Taliban in the 90's. We are all quite familiar what happened next - Talibinization of Afghanistan. Mullahs, militants and fundamentalists in the border region like the islamic law. Problem solved. The other head can entirely focus on destabilizing India's Kashmir. Pakistani ISI are readily given the go ahead from the goverment even though they don't need it. Terrorists are recruited and armed. Post 9/11 Pakistan is forced to relinquish its' tight association with the Taliban and show complete support to the US. Taliban goes into hiding in the border region. The US is able to attain some success but, nowhere near complete success. Pakistani ISI want the Pakistan border region left alone and forces Pakistan goverment to come up with an agreement. Incursions will continue, the border will remain volatile, madarassas will 'teach' the young, and terrorists will be recruited. The war will go on!

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
PROJECT GREEN
NWK Caption: At the Excel High School in Oakland, California a group of students, their teacher and members of community groups pose with air pollution monitors in front of a mural at the school.  July 26, 2008.       Left to Right:   Randy Colosky, a member of Global Community Monitor  wearing brown shirt ,Juan Hernandez, student (seated) ,   Ina Bendich, teacher Danyale Willingham,student in blue top).Elizabeth de Rham far right, member of the Rose Foundation.

Young pollution sleuths and community activists fight for healthier air.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
PAKISTAN
nuclear pakistan khan kabul bomb
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu