THE SPIRITUAL STATE
Marc Gellman
The Spiritual Seductions of Eloquence
A lesson for the election.
Last week I began my discussion about what the election ought to teach us about us. I raised the issue of how this election is a teachable moment for all of us to reflect on the ways we disguise our bigotry against minorities, women and people of a certain age.
This week I want to point out a second challenge raised by this election. I want you to think about the moral and spiritual significance of eloquence. What I worry about is our natural but troubling inclination to be swayed by words alone. We are in a word-drunk season again, and yet we have a chance to do something spiritually and morally and silently wise. We have a chance to stop and think not about how the words made us feel but what the words really mean.
The seductions of eloquence cut us in several ways. Eloquence seduces us to forget what we already know to be true. When I was in college and I left a particularly eloquent professor's classroom, I was his acolyte immediately. I felt somehow obligated by his eloquence to agree with everything he said. Only later did I realize that his arguments were fatally weakened and skewed by his ideology, but when I first heard him speak, I could hardly breathe from excitement. In this election, on both sides, you may be convinced to agree with a speech just because it is well crafted. Please take a beat and think about whether what you are being told so well about the world and our problems is actually true.
Another seduction of eloquence is that it moves us to buy what we do not need. I remember as a kid in Milwaukee listening mouth agape to the hawkers selling vegetable slicers at the Wisconsin State Fair. Their slick and seductive verbal and physical dexterity left both a pile of veggies and my capacity to reason in perfectly shredded piles. I bought one of their vegetable slicers and almost sliced off my finger. In this election, we will also be sold a bill of goods from both sides. However, in the shredded verbal piles will also be buried things we need to make us safe secure and prosperous. Our job is to sift through the shredded piles of words and find something we really need to eat.
Our moral challenge is to vote for trust and not just eloquence; to vote for good program ideas not just good words; to consider the answers the candidates give to the questions asked of them and not just the slick way they reframe and dodge the answers. Please understand this is a universal political caution against all the candidates in this race. I believe that all of them possess in different but equal measure great and seductive eloquence. Particularly after Sarah Palin's universally praised speech it is laughably false to say that Barak Obama is the only great speechifier in this race. With each and every candidate, the spiritual and moral and political challenge facing all of us in the months ahead is to look beyond our heavy breathing and applause and quietly ask ourselves whether their message we just heard actually seems to be true. Otherwise the loser in this election will again be the truth.
In all this I am thinking about Moses. Moses' first response to God's call to him to go down to Egypt and lead the people to freedom is to beg off because he was not sufficiently eloquent,
"And Moses said unto the LORD, O my LORD, I am not eloquent, neither heretofore, nor since thou hast spoken unto thy servant: but I am slow of speech, and of a slow tongue." (Exodus 4:10)
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: nomolos @ 09/21/2008 6:17:16 PM
Comment: I believe in the separation of shul and state and you have violated that precious principle. You exposed your Republican bias by exalting the shallow Sarah and tacitly demeaning Barcak. As a Jew in his 86th year I have listened to and read the written word of many rabbis, enough to discern the sincere and the mercenary.
The former are in the majority but a few are not.
Posted By: nomolos @ 09/21/2008 6:07:22 PM
Comment: I believe in the separation of shul and state, and you have violated that ptinciple.
Posted By: PhDiva @ 09/06/2008 2:23:58 PM
Comment: Since when is being educated, informed, and well-spoken something we don't want in a leader? Oh, I know. When that leader is Black. If we followed the logic of this article, then Americans should have ignored Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights legislation that he advocated. Gellman would have describe Martin Luther King as just another Black man who knows how to talk pretty, but shouldn't be trusted or heeded. Gellman thinks the American people are so stupid that we can't tell the difference between eloquence and action. What he won't admit is that this is just another attack on Obama.
This thinly veiled attack on Obama is disgustingly anti-intellectual and indirectly racist. This actually invokes very long-standing stereotypes about African Americans: that they have a strong oral tradition and know how to inspire by turning a phrase, but they cannot be trusted with responsibility and power.
We've had 8 years of a president who couldn't complete a grammatically correct sentence. Gellman's logic is that this made Bush trustworthy. Guess what, Gellman, people can be eloquent AND tell the truth AND be black, all at the same time. Also, as Bush has proven people can speak poorly AND lie. But like most republicans, Gellman doesn't want us to look at the current administration while making our vote. Gellman is using his own limited eloquence to demean Obama and to insult the intelligence of people who will vote for him. I hope he fails.