Getty Images
TECHNOLOGY

Living in the Clouds

Is computer software becoming obsolete?

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Like a growing number of companies, the New York Times has its head in the clouds—at least the part of its head that contains its memory. Without using a byte of its own processing power, the newspaper last month provided free, fully searchable access to its 1851 to 1922 archive—more than 15 million articles. How? Derek Gottfrid, the Times's senior software architect, outsourced and used Amazon’s cloud computing service. The result is the TimesMachine, a cool application that runs on the paper's Web site and is stored on Amazon's servers. "If we had to do it internally, we probably wouldn't have done it," Gottfrid tells NEWSWEEK.

If you thought Amazon sold only books, you probably think Google is just a search engine. Both Amazon and Google—along with Microsoft, IBM, Dell, Yahoo and other small players—have just started rolling out cloud computing services. Get used to hearing that expression. In April, Gartner Research dubbed it "the biggest buzz phrase of 2008, [but] little understood until 2009." At its most basic, cloud computing is the ability to use software and data on the Internet (a.k.a., the cloud) instead of on your hard drive.

Ten years ago if you wanted to do something with your PC you needed to buy software and install it. The ascent of Web 2.0—to deploy an older buzz phrase—is making that practice obsolete. "Suddenly, what cloud computing allows is for businesses and individuals to use it as if it were their own. It makes computing a heck of a lot less expensive," says tech journalist Nicholas Carr, author of "The Big Switch: Rewiring the World, From Edison to Google."

Driving this leap forward is the proliferation of high-speed Internet connections, cheaper and more powerful chips and drives, and the construction of data centers that house thousands of computers. Also, lest we forget, "IT is a pain," says Mike Eaton, CEO of Cloudworks, a service that runs a suite of business applications, like Outlook, that allows customers access to their files from anywhere. "IT is very expensive, it's difficult to implement, it's highly complicated. It's hard to find people with that expertise and make it affordable and reliable." Businesses, he says, want to focus on delivering their products to customers—not backing up servers or swapping cables at 2:30 in the morning if something goes wrong at a data center somewhere.

You don't need to run a business with an overburdened IT department to see the promise of cloud computing. Apple just got the message with its new personal application suite, MobileMe. But Google has been on board for years with productivity and communications applications like Gmail, Google Reader and its online calendar. For example, this article is being written on a password-protected online Google Doc, not Microsoft Word, which came installed on my PC. I can turn off this computer middraft and access it from any device with a Web connection. In fact, I just did—and I didn't need to e-mail it to myself or print it out. Which suggests that conducting affairs in the cloud is not only convenient, it's also greener: less capital and fewer printouts means less waste.

Google's business suite launched in February 2007 and already has half a million clients running on it, according to Dave Girouard, president of Google Enterprise. "If you want to have a small business anywhere in the world, and all you have is a few computers and you don't want to buy software or have a data center, all you need is a connection to the Internet," says Girouard. "Within five years a huge fraction of businesses—maybe 90 percent—won't host their own e-mail." Microsoft only just launched Office Live and Microsoft Online for individuals and businesses. Coca-Cola's distribution division recently signed up for Microsoft Online, effectively removing e-mail and documents from their own servers and floating them up into Microsoft's cloud.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: Tea6 @ 09/03/2008 4:51:58 PM

    Comment: There should be a law against transfering social security numbers and other private data outside the US to foreign data centers. Homeland security forces people to jump through all kinds of silly hoops but if big business wants to send your private information around the world, hey, no problem.

  • Posted By: TuacaTom @ 06/13/2008 12:22:33 AM

    Comment: The main concern some companies might have with outsourcing thier web business off-site is that the security of the data is no longer under their own control. For instance, millions of U.S. citizens financial data is stored at outsourced locations in 3rd world countries that don't even have reliable electricity, let alone simple things like toilets. How secure does that make you feel about your social security number and other related data fields?

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 06/12/2008 9:38:44 AM

    Comment: Byte has sent us the lightning bolt and the thunder. All the good things.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu